A levee built in 1949 that broke around midnight on 10 March 2023,
a San Andreas section that creeps instead of breaking, and
a FAIR Plan share of 39.8 percent in Big Sur against zero in Pacific Grove.

Markets

334

Google rating

5.0

CA DOI licence

6013787

Family

3rd gen

Start with the honest part: we are 250 miles south, not on Alvarado Street

Bollinsure is an independent brokerage operating from Westlake Village, on the Ventura–Los Angeles county line. We do not have an office in Salinas, Monterey or Carmel, and a broker who fudges something that easy to check is telling you what the rest of the relationship will be like. We serve Monterey County the way we serve Santa Barbara, the Bay Area, the Central Valley and Los Angeles: you send a declarations page, a licensed broker reads it, and the conversation happens by phone or on a call, which is how most of this work has been done for years anyway.

Independent means we are not one carrier's agent. We place with admitted carriers, with non-admitted surplus lines markets through a licensed surplus line broker, and with the California FAIR Plan where the standard market has stopped writing. In this county that range is the whole job, because the Salinas Valley floor, the town of Pajaro, Carmel Valley, Big Sur and the Peninsula are different markets with different problems: a levee, a floodplain, a canyon fire history, a coast road, and a two-million-dollar median that the Census cannot print above.

The county's Elections page, as we read it, lists Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City and Seaside as incorporated cities, eleven in the table we could extract; Soledad did not appear in that extraction and we do not add it from elsewhere. County government sits at 168 West Alisal Street in Salinas, which is the conventional seat and the point on our map.

The Pajaro levee: built in 1949, breached around midnight on 10 March 2023, closed on the 14th

The Pajaro River roughly defines the border between Santa Cruz and Monterey counties and empties into Monterey Bay west of Watsonville. The Department of Water Resources writes that its levees were constructed in 1949 by the Army Corps of Engineers and are maintained by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency, and that "a population of around 3,600 people and more than 800 structures depend on these levees." Its account of March 2023: crews worked "until around 11:30 p.m. on March 10"; "shortly after, a levee break occurred"; "the floodwater breached the levee around midnight on March 10, 2023." The breach was closed "on the evening of March 14," initially "approximately 4 to 6 feet below the existing crown." The Corps' own project page, which we could read only as search-indexed text because the live site refused our request, dates the left-bank breach to "the evening of Friday, 10 March 2023," at roughly River Mile 10, "flooding the town of Pajaro," with two further sites at Highway 1 and near River Mile 1. Midnight and evening are the same night described by two agencies, and we quote both.

The repairs and the replacement are two different projects with two different price tags. The emergency repairs under Public Law 84-99 are listed by the Corps at $18.2 million, with the three sites completed between November 2023 and February 2024. The permanent project, the Pajaro River at Watsonville flood risk management project, is listed at a total cost of $599,001,000, $389,350,650 federal and $209,650,350 non-federal, with a project partnership agreement signed on 2 November 2023, the Reach 6 contract awarded in September 2025 and completion expected in fall 2027. The Pajaro Regional Flood Management Agency describes it as "a $599 million life-safety project" providing "100-year flood protection to the City of Watsonville and the town of Pajaro, and a mix of 100-year and 25-year flood protection to the surrounding agricultural areas," with the Corps and the state paying all of it, 65 and 35 percent. The Governor's office, at the groundbreaking on 2 October 2024, put the non-federal share at "an estimated $210 million of the $599 million" and said the state had already provided $47 million. The agency's page also records the earlier flood: "the 1995 flood caused more than $95 million in damage and two people died." No agency page we opened prints the design level of the 1949 levee in years or cubic feet per second, so we do not.

• What the levee means for a policy. A homeowners form excludes flood. Behind a levee, FEMA's maps may show the land as protected until the levee fails, at which point the water does not consult the map. Federal flood insurance has a thirty-day waiting period and a $250,000 dwelling cap; private flood forms and excess layers exist above it. For a house in Pajaro or Watsonville, the question is not whether the map requires a policy but whether the family can afford to be without one until fall 2027.
• The Salinas River recorded the failure. The California Nevada River Forecast Center's gauge at Spreckels crested at 26.89 feet and 23,300 cubic feet per second on 13 March 2023, above its 26-foot moderate stage, with the footnote "discharge affected to unknown degree by upstream levee failure." The gauge's flood of record is 30.29 feet and 95,000 cubic feet per second on 12 March 1995. Upstream at Bradley the January 2023 storm crested at 19.64 feet and 45,600 cubic feet per second on 10 January, against a record of 23.44 feet and 120,000 cubic feet per second on 11 March 1995.
• The Carmel River has its own record. At Robles del Rio the flood stage is 8.5 feet, the flood of record is 12.90 feet and 16,000 cubic feet per second on 10 March 1995, and the January 2023 crest reached 12.69 feet and 11,000 cubic feet per second on 9 January. The Forecast Center's five-year tables print no crest at or above minor flood stage at any of the three gauges in 2024, 2025 or 2026.

We did not open the FEMA flood insurance study for Pajaro, Castroville, Salinas or Carmel Valley, so we describe no zone here. Send the address and we will pull the panel.

Soberanes, River, Carmel, Dolan, Colorado, and two fires still burning as we write

Fire in this county runs along the Santa Lucia Range and the canyons behind Carmel, not across the Salinas Valley floor. CAL FIRE's live page for the Soberanes Fire, a Los Padres National Forest incident, puts it at 132,127 acres from 22 July to 13 October 2016 in Garrapata State Park and Palo Colorado north of Big Sur, 68 structures destroyed, 5 damaged, and one firefighter killed; the page prints no cause. August 2020 brought two at once east and south of the Peninsula: the River Fire, 48,088 acres from Pine Canyon and River Road east of Salinas, 30 destroyed and 13 damaged with four civilian injuries, and the Carmel Fire, 6,901 acres at Cachagua Road and Carmel Valley Road, 73 destroyed and 7 damaged; neither live page prints a containment date or a cause. The Dolan Fire on the Big Sur coast that same month has no live CAL FIRE page we could find, so we quote InciWeb's 29 September 2020 report: 124,924 acres, 85 percent contained, 14 habitable structures and 5 outbuildings destroyed, cause under investigation. We do not add the three 2020 fires into one total, because they come from two different record-keepers. The Colorado Fire of January 2022 in Palo Colorado Canyon: 687 acres, cause debris burning, one structure destroyed.

Two incidents are live on the day we write. The Timber Fire, a non-CAL FIRE incident southeast of Loma Vista, started 8 August 2026 and stood at 25,426 acres and 39 percent contained on the morning of 13 September, with 661 structures threatened, three firefighter injuries and no destroyed count printed. The Plaskett Fire, off Forest Road 23S10 east of Los Burros Road, started 26 August 2026 and stood at 29,961 acres and 83 percent contained the same morning, with no damage assessment block. Those figures will be wrong by the time you read them; the live pages are the source, and we will re-read them.

• The 2025 hazard maps reached Monterey County on 10 March 2025, in the third of four phases of the state fire marshal's Local Responsibility Area rollout. We did not open the adopting ordinances for the county or for Monterey, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Seaside, Marina or King City, so we quote no ordinance numbers.
• What a mapped zone changes is the rebuild. A home inside a Very High zone that burns is rebuilt to Chapter 7A of the building code, and the line on your declarations page that pays for that difference is Ordinance and Law. In Carmel Valley, Cachagua and Palo Colorado it is the first thing we read.
• 2023 to 2025 on the floor and in the foothills. CAL FIRE's 2024 archive lists Metz at 1,100 acres, Lonoak at 255 and Piney at 225, with no structure counts on the archive rows; we did not open their live pages.

There is no non-renewal freeze here, and the two that existed expired in 2021 and 2023

After a fire that draws a state of emergency, Insurance Code section 675.1 lets the Insurance Commissioner issue a bulletin that bars insurers from cancelling or not renewing residential policies in and adjacent to the fire perimeter for one year. We read the Department's bulletin index from 2018 through 2026 on 13 September 2026. Two bulletins named this county. Bulletin 2020-11, as amended on 6 November 2020, ran one year from the Governor's proclamation of 18 August 2020 and covered the Dolan, Carmel and River fires; its Dolan list reads 93927, 93920, 93932, 93928, 93923, 93960, 93930, 93924, 93426, 93452 and 93450, its Carmel list 93924, 93940, 93923, 93908, 93960, 93927, 93920 and 93943, and its River list runs to twenty-three ZIP codes from Salinas and Seaside out to San Juan Bautista and Hollister. It expired on 18 August 2021. Bulletin 2022-6, dated 12 July 2022, ran one year from the proclamation of 1 July 2022 for the Colorado Fire, covering 93426, 93452, 93920, 93921, 93923, 93924, 93927, 93928, 93932, 93940, 93943 and 93953. It expired on 1 July 2023.

No 2026 bulletin title names the Timber or Plaskett fires, and as of the date above no freeze is in force for any Monterey County ZIP code. A household in Carmel Valley, Big Sur or Salinas being non-renewed this autumn has no statutory pause to lean on, and the remedy is another market lined up before the notice arrives rather than after.

• The ZIP lists are worth reading once. Notice how 93924 Carmel Valley and 93920 Big Sur appear on both bulletins and on all three 2020 fire lists. That is the same geography the FAIR Plan table describes below.

Big Sur at 39.8 percent, Carmel Valley at 19.6, Pacific Grove and north Salinas at zero

The FAIR Plan's county table, titled for its residential, commercial and business-owner lines together, puts Monterey County at 5,402 policies in force as of 30 September 2025, from 4,231 a year earlier, 3,101 in 2023, 2,597 in 2022 and 1,934 in 2021; the sheet itself prints 28 percent for the last step and we quote that as the sheet's figure. Statewide the same sheet prints 642,010.

The Department of Insurance's 2022 table, by ZIP code, shows where in the county that growth lives. 93920 Big Sur: 157 voluntary dwellings, 104 FAIR Plan, 39.8 percent. 93924 Carmel Valley: 1,955 and 477, 19.6 percent. 93923 Carmel: 5,211 and 604, 10.4 percent. 93908 Salinas, the Corral de Tierra and Toro side: 3,857 and 246, 6.0 percent. 93907, printed under Salinas, the Prunedale side: 5,510 and 243, 4.2 percent. Then the flats and the Peninsula proper: 93940 Monterey 2.2 percent, 93953 Pebble Beach 2.1, 93930 King City 1.1, 93933 Marina 0.2, 93901 Salinas 0.1, and 93906 Salinas and 93950 Pacific Grove at 0.0 percent, 10,899 voluntary dwellings against two in north Salinas and 5,144 against two in Pacific Grove. Seaside's 93955 was not in the block we extracted and we quote nothing for it.

• On the coast road and up the valley, the review is the FAIR Plan plus a wrap. The FAIR Plan dwelling policy is fire, lightning, internal explosion and smoke, with optional extensions; it does not carry liability, theft or water damage. The Difference in Conditions policy that supplies those is a second contract from a second carrier, and the two have to be read together for gaps, especially loss of use during a Highway 1 closure.
• On the Peninsula, the review is about limits. When a carrier will write the house, the question is whether it writes it correctly against what a Carmel contractor charges to rebuild in 2026, and the Census cannot even print Carmel-by-the-Sea's median, as the next section shows.
• In Salinas and Marina, the market still works and the exposure is water. A zero-percent FAIR Plan ZIP with a river on two sides is a flood conversation, not a fire one.

A San Andreas section that creeps up to 32 millimetres a year, and the 1989 quake that liquefied the Pajaro floodplain

The USGS Quaternary fault database describes the San Andreas fault zone, Creeping section, record 1e, compiled by Bryant and Lundberg of the California Geological Survey in 2002, in Monterey and San Benito counties. Its length field reads 130 kilometers of a total fault length of 1,082; its synopsis calls it "the 132-km-long Creeping section," and we quote both. It runs from just south of San Juan Bautista to Middle Mountain north of Parkfield. The historic earthquake field is blank, and unlike the sections to the north and south the record says why: "the most recent paleoearthquake along this section has not been determined" and "the concept of recurrence intervals is not appropriate." This stretch of the fault moves without waiting. The slip-rate category is greater than 5 millimeters a year; Perkins and colleagues measured 22 millimeters a year, plus 6 or minus 4; creep at Melendy Ranch runs 20 to 23; and the synopsis says creep reaches "as high as 32 mm/yr" on "a 55-km-long central segment northeast of King City." The Parkfield section, record 1f, begins where the Creeping section ends; we opened its title and not its body, so we quote no figures for it. The Reliz fault, by the USGS map SIM 3059, trends northwest along the base of the Sierra de Salinas "for 60 km to the vicinity of Spreckels, where it is largely concealed."

The earthquake this county remembers is the one that was not on its own faults. The USGS event page for M 6.9, the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, records 63 deaths, 3,757 injuries and "an estimated $6 billion in property damage," with liquefaction "in the Santa Cruz and Monterey Bay areas" and unreinforced masonry that "failed at San Francisco and Monterey." The Survey's Professional Paper 1551 says the liquefaction was of floodplain deposits "along the Pajaro and Salinas Rivers in the Monterey Bay region" and that "liquefaction at 134 locations caused $99.2 million of the total earthquake loss of $5.9 billion." Six billion and 5.9 billion are the same event described in two USGS documents, and we quote both. The same Pajaro floodplain that liquefied in 1989 flooded in 2023.

• The offshore fault is a tsunami source, not just a shaking source. The Geological Survey's 2021 tsunami maps note that "the San Gregorio Fault runs through the offshore Monterey Canyon" and that a large enough earthquake "could generate a landslide capable of producing a surge that would hit the coast in minutes"; the City of Monterey and Moss Landing "saw slight increases in Tsunami Hazard Areas," and Moss Landing harbor's damage in the 2011 tsunami "totaled more than $2 million with 2020 inflation." The Qfaults report we opened for the San Gregorio, section 60a, lists Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties, not Monterey, so we quote no slip rate for the stretch off this coast.
• Earthquake is a separate purchase, and tsunami is flood. A homeowners policy excludes earth movement; an earthquake policy has a percentage deductible we read as a dollar figure. A tsunami surge is water and falls to a flood policy, not the earthquake one. Moss Landing and Cannery Row are the addresses where both conversations happen at once.
• We did not open a liquefaction map. The state's Official Map for a Peninsula or Moss Landing quadrangle was not opened, so we describe no zone; ask and we will pull it for your parcel.

Sixty-nine thousand owners, sixty-three thousand renters, and a median the Census cannot print

The American Community Survey's 2020–2024 five-year estimates put Monterey County at 437,613 people, 145,469 housing units, 132,489 occupied and 12,980 vacant, of which 7,034 are held for seasonal, recreational or occasional use; 68,993 owner-occupied against 63,496 renter-occupied; a median owner-occupied value of $781,000. The 2024 one-year estimate for the county is a different vintage, 436,251 people and a median of $808,600 with wider margins, and we do not blend the two. Salinas: 161,761 people, 45,249 units, 20,491 owner and 23,129 renter households, 128 seasonal units, median $654,100. Monterey: 29,613 people, 14,136 units, 4,535 owner and 7,999 renter, 966 seasonal, median $1,076,300. Pacific Grove: 14,951 people, 8,286 units, 3,522 owner and 3,470 renter, 840 seasonal, median $1,190,400. Seaside: 31,814 people, 10,853 units, 3,676 owner and 6,695 renter, 65 seasonal, median $787,100. Marina: 22,563 people, 8,161 units, 3,328 owner and 4,432 renter, 118 seasonal, median $818,700.

Then Carmel-by-the-Sea: 3,162 people, 3,442 housing units, 1,619 occupied and 1,823 vacant, of which 1,542 are seasonal; 973 owner and 646 renter households; and a median owner-occupied value printed as $2,000,001, which is not a value but the ceiling of the Census Bureau's scale. A town where more than half the houses are somebody's second house and the median is off the chart is a town of high-value forms, seasonal-occupancy clauses and rebuild costs no online estimator has met.

• Renters are half this county. In Salinas, Seaside and Marina renters outnumber owners. A renters policy is the cheapest contract we write and the one most often missing after a fire or a flood; the River Fire's evacuation zones ran through east Salinas.
• Seasonal is its own occupancy. Carmel's 1,542 seasonal units and Pacific Grove's 840 are homes a standard owner-occupied form was not written for. A seasonal or secondary residence designation on the declarations page is the fix, and it changes the premium.
• Ordinance and Law on a 1920s cottage. Much of the Peninsula's stock predates every code it would be rebuilt under; the percentage on that line decides who pays the difference.

Strawberries and leaf lettuce at a billion dollars each, and a $3.3 billion visitor year

The Monterey County Farm Bureau's summary of the 2025 crop report, which we could read only as indexed text because the live page refused our request, puts the county's gross agricultural value at $4,822,429,000, three percent below 2024, with strawberries at $1,068,736,000 in their fifth year at the top and leaf lettuce at $1,001,018,000, "first time over $1 billion." Head lettuce $583,706,000, broccoli $516,030,000, wine grapes $114,603,000, livestock and poultry $109,669,000. The page notes that these "are gross production amounts and do not represent profits." We did not open the Agricultural Commissioner's own PDF and quote no figure from it.

The visitor economy is the Peninsula's. See Monterey's release of 7 May 2026 puts 2025 travel spending at $3.3 billion, "a 4.1% increase over 2024," surpassing the 2019 record, with "nearly 28,000 jobs" and $346 million in tax revenue, and calls tourism "the largest industry on the Monterey Peninsula and the second largest in the county." Its release a year earlier put 2024 at $3.1 billion, 27,596 jobs and tax receipts exceeding $310 million; the two years are quoted separately. The Naval Postgraduate School's 2025 fact sheet lists 2,479 enrolled students; the Defense Language Institute's pages give three different counts on three different dates, about 2,500 service members on its About page and about 2,000 a year in its 2025 self-study, and we quote the dated page rather than pick.

• Farm packing, cooling and labour contracting in Salinas, Castroville and Gonzales are spoilage, equipment-breakdown and workers' compensation exposures on a payroll that swings with the harvest; the audit at year end reconciles the estimate, and we read the estimate against the season.
• Hospitality on the Peninsula is a business-income conversation. A restaurant on Cannery Row or an inn in Big Sur loses income when Highway 1 closes, as it has repeatedly; the business-income form's civil authority clause and its waiting period decide whether those weeks are covered.
• Vineyards in the Salinas Valley carry crop, equipment and tasting-room exposures under three different forms.

What a coverage review actually is

You send the declarations page from your current policy, or the pages from more than one policy if you have a house in Pacific Grove and a cabin in Big Sur, or a farm operation in the valley. A licensed broker reads it against the record on this page: the levee and the gauges, the fire history and the mapped zone, the state's FAIR Plan share for your ZIP, the creeping fault and the tsunami line, and the occupancy your declarations page claims against the one the house actually has. Then we call you and tell you, plainly, what we would change and what we would not, and what those changes cost across the markets we can reach.

There is no charge for the review, no application to fill in before it, and no obligation at the end. If the right answer is to keep what you have, we will say so; we would rather earn the second call.

Monterey County insurance questions